Final Report of the Bear River Reservoir Study
HONEYVILLE RESERVOIR STUDY
Cortney Draper, Jamie Powell, Brad Wright
GIS 30
May 31, 1996
The Bear River
INTRODUCTION
A reservoir on the Bear River in Box Elder county near the city of Honeyville has been proposed since the late 1950's. The State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, and Division of Water Resources has continued interest in constructing a reservoir in this area. The proposed dam would be an earthfill embankment, with materials comming from the surrounding area. The reservoir would extend up stream for approximately 13 miles, with a width ranging from 500 feet to just over a mile. The reservoir would inundate several aspects of the surrounding area. The highway, springs of culinary water, local parks, historic Hampton's Ford areas, several homes, and utility lines will be effected by the reservoir.
Potential Inundated Land

Specifications for the reservoir and dam are as follows:
| DAM |
DIMENSIONS |
| Crest Elevation |
4,290 feet MSL |
| Height |
90 feet |
Crest Length |
| Dam |
1,000 feet |
| Dike |
1,800 |
| Fill Volume |
1,400,000 cubic feet |
| RESERVOIR |
DIMENSIONS |
Conservation Pool |
| Active Storage |
10,000 arce-feet |
| Total Storage |
107,000 acre-feet |
| Surface Area |
117,000 acre-feet |
| Reservoir Length |
3,903 acres |
| Surface Elevation |
4,275 MSL |
The stored water in the reservoir is designated to be used first by the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge and second use will occur along the Wasatch-Front(Municipal and Industrial use). Box Elder County will be given priority for agriculture and if needed for municipal and industrial use. The construction of this reservoir is intended to benefit Utah by creating an added surplus of 150,000 acre-feet of water annually will help with existing and future needs for the counties of Box Elder, Weber, Davis, and Salt Lake. Below is a table that shows the supply, demand and year of future need for water in each of these counties.
County Developed Present Year Additional
Supply(ac-ft) Demand(ac-ft) Water Needed
_________________________________________________________________
Box Elder 785,900 781,900 2010
Weber 681,300 604,400 >2025
Davis 300,000 285,700 >2025
Salt Lake 596,900 504,800 2021
_________________________________________________________________
OBJECTIVES
Incedently, there has been no GIS approach taken by the Division of Water Resources to help in their presentation of this proposed action. Our foucus for our project is to show how GIS can be used and applied to this proposed action.
Independent variable:
A. Location of the Dam and Reservoir.
Dependent variables:
A. Effects of vegetation within reservoir boundary.
B. Road affected.
C. Location of springs within reservoir boundary.
D. Land ownership within reservoir boundary.
METHODS
Reservoir Boundary
Proposed Honeyville Reservoir and Dam location using ArcView. Layout tools were used to construct text in the map
The reservoir boundary was created using ArcInfo. The boundary is digitized from the Tremonton 1:100,000 quaddrangle, at the highest water level, due to the fact that the water level is known to fluctuate. The resevoir boundary is overlaid with a roads coverage which was copied from the /auto/utah database and clipped to the area of interest. Only interstate and major highways are shown. A rivers coverage taken from the AGRC was also overlaid to show the location of the Bear river in it's present state. Also an elevation lines coverage was copied from the AGRC and clipped to Box Elder county boundary to show location of the Wellsville mountains. All coverages were digitized at 1:100.000 scale.
Vegetation Analysis
The reservoir boundary was overlaid with the vegetation coverage derived as part of the Utah Gap Analysis to show innundation of general vegetation types. Vegetation types that will be covered by the resevoir include wetlands, lowland riparian zones and agriculture.

LOWLAND RIPARIAN - Riparian areas generally lower than 5500 feet. Principal woody species include fremont cottonwood Populus fremontii, Salt Cedar
Tamarix pentandra, netleaf hackberry Celtis reticulata, velvet ash Fraxinus
velutina, desertwillow Chilopsis linearis, sandbar willow Salix exigua and
squawbush Rhus trilobata.
AGRICULTURE - Row crops, irrigated pasture and hay fields, dry farm crops.
WETLAND - Low elevation marsh and wetland areas. Principal species include
cattail Typha latifolia, bullrush Scirpus spp. and sedge Carex spp..
SALT DESERT SCRUB - Shrublands principally dominated by shadscale atriplex
confertifolia, gray molly Kochia vestita, mat-atriplex Atriplex corrugata, castle
valley clover Atriplex cuneata, winterfat Ceratoides lanata, budsage Artemesia
spinescens, fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens, halogeten Halogeten glomeratus,
mormon tea Ephedra spp., horsebrush Tetradymia canescens, snakeweed Gutierrezia
sarothrae and rabbitbrush Chrysothamnus spp. Primary associated shrub species
include greasewood Sarcobatus vermiculatus, sagebrush Artemisia spp. and
blackbrush Coleogyne ramosissima. Primary associated forb species includes
halogeten Halogeten glomeratus.
Locations of farmlands along the Bear River using satelite imagery.
Use of Landsat TM 30 meter resolution bands 6,4,2, image, and Spot 10 meter panchromatic images, to show vegetation density and farmlands along the present Bear River. Farmlands can be located on both sides of the river.
Typical farmlands located on the floodplains along the Bear River. These will be inundated by the reservoir.
Spring Locations
Below is a coverage showing the location of springs in relation to the reservoir boundary. In addition the springs will only be inundted during high water levels. However, the springs that serve as sources of culinary water for Garland and Tremonton would be inundated, and the replacement of culinary water would be required.
Road Location

Roads and bridges that will need to be expanded due to the reservoir. Two bridges will have to be elongated. The highway 13 bridge will increase to .7 miles in length and highway 102 to .9 miles. Some intermediate roads will also be inundated including access roads to Hamptons historical farm and the restaurant itself.

Canals used to irrigate present farmlands will be inundated.

Computerized aerial view of the proposed reservoir area.
This image was produced by overlaying TM data and 90 meter DEM data using Imagine.
CONCLUSION
By using ARC/Info we have been able to accurately display the project area. Within this area we have successfully shown the effects on vegetation, roads, springs, land ownership. With the use of imagery, we were able to locate farmlands within the project boundary. The DEM was implemented to show the general releif of this area. Despite all of our efforts to help in contributing information to this action, the proposed action for the Honeyville reservoir has been canceled. This plan would have supplied additional water to the wasatch front, but the quality of the water is poor and the cost for water treatment would have been to high. Future plans for water supply will come from other sources along the wasatch-front. These plans also include the CUP (Central Utah Project) which has already begun. The Honeyville Reservoir would have lessened the demand for the CUP, by increasing additional water needed by communities along the Wasatch Front.
REFRENCES
Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Proposed Action for the Honeyville Reservoir.
Utah AGRC Database.
TM - 30 meter Resolution IMAGE, Tremonton IMAGE.
SPOT - 10 meter Panchromatic, Cache Valley, south.
DEM's /auto/utah/ , Tremonton quadrangle.
Biowest - conclusion information.
Tremonton, 1-100,000 USGS guadrangle